TA Excellence Award
The Department of Psychology at St. George campus is pleased to announce a new annual outstanding TA award for our best teaching assistant nominated for excellent work in the previous academic year. The first ever award will be presented at the December 2018 Holiday Party with nominations drawn from Teaching Assistants from Fall 2017, Winter 2018 and Summer 2018 courses.
ABOUT THE AWARD
Up to two awards will be offered per year. Nominations will occur in the early Fall (beginning in 2018) and the announcement of award recipient(s) will be made in December at the annual department holiday dinner. Recipients of the TA Excellence Award will receive a certificate of recognition and $250. The TA Coordinator (Nora Sellers) will oversee the selection process.
CALL FOR NOMINATIONS (NOW OPEN)
Nominations for the TA Excellence Award 2017-2018 are now open. To nominate a Teaching Assistant(s) please complete the appropriate nomination form below and send/bring it, along with supporting documentation, to Nora Sellers, room 4026 Sidney Smith Hall or email firstname.lastname@example.org. If you are emailing in your nomination, please put TA Excellence Award Nomination in the subject line. The deadline for nominations is NOVEMBER 2, 2018..
TA EXCELLENCE AWARD NOMINATION FORM FOR INSTRUCTORS (PDF fillable form)
TA EXCELLENCE AWARD NOMINATION FORM FOR STUDENTS (PDF fillable form)
Who is eligible? Teaching Assistants (CUPE 3902 Unit 1) who have been assigned to a St. George Campus Undergraduate Psychology course in Fall 2017, Winter 2018, or Summer 2018 terms are eligible for this inaugural award.
Who should submit the nomination form? The Department will select from candidates that are nominated. It will accept nominations from the following two groups:
- Student nominations: Students in a particular course may nominate a teaching assistant for the award. They will be encouraged to provide supporting documentation, such as comments from numerous students on the qualities and excellent work of their TA, samples of written feedback they have received on course work, etc.
- Course instructor nominations: Course instructors may nominate a Teaching Assistant based on comments received from students, evidence of excellent work, or direct observation of the TA’s performance. Nominations should include details of performance and preferably with supporting documentation (some evidence from students required – this might be emails the instructor has received from students about this TA, comments about the TA from informal mid-course surveys or end-of-semester course evaluations, etc.).
After nominations have been received, the TA will be notified and invited to submit a brief (< 200 words) statement highlighting their contributions to the course, as well as any additional supporting documentation they would like to provide (e.g., emails they have received from students).
The Selection Committee includes the Teaching Assistant administrator (Nora), Undergraduate Chair, two volunteer faculty members (including at least one member of the teaching stream faculty), and the previous TA Excellence Award winner (if available/applicable).The Selection Committee will make a decision based upon the following criteria:
- Nominators: For student nominations, is there instructor support? For instructor nominations, is there student support?
- Communication with Students: was the TA responsive to student questions, able to answer them in a way that enhanced understanding?
- Communication with Instructor(s): was the TA responsive to instructor emails, requests, etc. (in essence, did the TA make the life of the instructor easier?)
- Enthusiasm: was the TA enthusiastic about the course material/assignments? Did they inspire excitement or curiosity about the subject matter?
- Knowledge: was the TA knowledgeable about the course subject matter? If the course fell outside the TAs particular area of expertise, did they take steps to enhance their understanding of the material?
- Grading: did the TA mark in a fair, consistent, prompt manner and give solid and appropriate feedback to the students?
- Other: did the TA display any other characteristics that enhanced the learning experience of students and/or the teaching experience of the instructor? Did the TA augment the course through innovative ideas or pedagogical development? Was the TA responsive to Psychology staff requests?